๐
ย RETURN TO FIRST IMPRESSIONS
๐
ย RETURN TO CHA REVIEW OF BOOKS AND FILMS
Satyajit Ray (director), Branches of the Tree, 1990. 130 min.

Made and released in 1990, Satyajit Rayโs Branches of the Tree arrives as an artefact of a bygone sensibility, with its deliberately slow pacing, as it explores each branch of a family tree, and a belief in simpler virtues (โWork is faithโ and โHonesty is the best policyโ). The set-up is straightforward: a father who is turning 70 and his four sons and their families. One of the sons suffers from a brain injury caused by a motorcycle accident when he was in London as a student. He serves as the holy fool in the film. His incoherent babbling also represents the trauma of a particular class of Indians who were indoctrinated by British values through education but who now find themselves unable to identify with post-independence India. Itโs such an odd, antiquated notion that I was surprised to even find it as a subject in a late work by a long-time filmmaker.
Could it be that Rayโs films are also about the mourning of the loss of the direct contact with the coloniserโs culture? Note that the final scene isnโt a familial reunion as much as a nostalgic embrace of the British past. The patriarchโs life reflects the nationโs development after Independence, while the sonsโ careers reflect their own era, which is characterised as full of corruption. The conversations of black money and its white counterpart seems naรฏve at the moment of globalisation, but Ray has no other vocabulary to conceptualise his worldview. Interestingly, it was black-market money that reinvigorated Indian cinema after the collapse of the studios after the war. Is Ray saying that making a black money film is inevitable at the time of the filmโs production? Is this why thereโs an unexpected dubbed song sequence in the film?

The gaunt patriarch in his sickbed is later echoed by Ray holding his honorary Oscar in his hospital cot during the Academy Awards telecast. What then to make of the patriarchโs own father who still lives in the same house? He is senile and an unwanted presence. To follow the logic of the film, he signifies India before Independence and Partition. But canโt he also be India without Britain? Isnโt this why he canโt speak coherently? I found this character troubling, as he scuttles back to his back room unable to cross over an invisible spatial threshold. Rayโs preoccupation with culture, class, and ethics, has always struck me as an appeal to the civilised West, leaving those not with the programme gawking at the camera with no words and music to express their stupefaction.
How to cite:ย Tomori, Toshi. โAn Artifact of a Bygone Sensibility: Satyajit Rayโs Branches of the Tree.โย Cha: An Asian Literary Journal, 17 Jan. 2024,ย chajournal.blog/2024/01/17/branches.



Toshiย Tomori is an amateur film critic and posts reviews on his blog, Orpheus in Hell. He has degrees in comparative literature from California and Toronto. He currently lives in Japan.